CFP: Visual Rhetoric (11/15; journal issue)

From: David Blakesley (blakesle@purdue.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 09 2000 - 18:26:57 EDT

  • Next message: julija sukys: "CFP: Writing and Terror (10/25; 3/16/01-3/17/01)"

    Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture
    -----------------------------------------
    Special Issue-Visual Rhetoric (Spring 2001)
    Guest Editors: David Blakesley, Purdue University
                            Collin Brooke, Old Dominion University
    Managing Editors: Byron Hawk, James Madison University
                            Dave Rieder, University of Texas at Arlington

    While a picture may be worth a thousand words, a word may be worth a
    thousand pictures, too. How can this be? The problem posed by this
    special issue of Enculturation is much like the one that W. J. T. Mitchell
    envisioned for his own critical project years ago: "What is an image? How is
    it different from a text? Why do these questions--and the answers to
    them--make a difference, not only to our understanding of literature and the
    arts, but to the whole fabric of human signification, and the ethical and
    political cultures that are mediated by it?" ("The Last Formalist, or W. J.
    T. Mitchell as Romantic Dinosaur," An Interview with Orrin N. C. Wang,
    Romantic Circles Praxis Series,
    http://www.rc.umd.edu/praxis/mitchell/interview/mitch-interview.html). We
    believe that the problem now before us has become even more perplexing as
    the text|image distinction collapses under the weight of not only the
    theoretical scrutiny of people like Mitchell, Jean Baudrillard, and James
    Elkins, among others, but also the dissemination of the word, the
    interanimation of the image and the word in the life of the Internet, with
    its phantastic mixture of permanence and change, seeing and seen, surface
    and depth. Ours is a world in which to see is to be, and to be seen, or in
    which believing is seeing.

    As Kenneth Burke put it long ago, "A way of seeing is also a way of not
    seeing--a focus on object A involves a neglect of object B." Words are ways
    of seeing, of course, so our attempts to explain or reanimate our world
    symbolically are ways of re-imagining the bases for identification,
    division, and belief, which is why the rhetorical entails the visual at the
    scene of contact, where our terminologies may foster blindness or insight,
    love or war, truth or lies, being or nothingness. We thus hope that this
    issue of Enculturation both helps us understand the ways in which the visual
    functions rhetorically, as well as answer the broader question of how and
    why the rhetorical turn has become so thoroughly visual.

    We value the performative aspect of the visual, so we encourage visual
    artists, photographers, poets, and graphic designers to focus their (and
    our) attention on these issues or to submit potential interface designs. We
    also encourage prospective authors and artists to capitalize on the
    possibilities afforded by electronic publication, so verbal and visual
    hypertexts, exhibitions, film, or other hybrid media are acceptable formats
    for submission.

    Inquiries and submissions should be directed to either of the two guest
    editors: David Blakesley, Department of English, Purdue University, West
    Lafayette, Indiana, 47909; email: blakesle@purdue.edu; fax: 765.494.3780;
    phone: 765.494.3772; or Collin Brooke, Department of English, Old Dominion
    University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23529; email: cbrooke@odu.edu; phone:
    757.683.3982.

    The deadline for submissions is November 15, 2000.

    Enculturation is on the web at http://www.uta.edu/huma/enculturation/.

    Possible Topics:

    * the visual turn
    * visual arts (painting, cinema, video, photography)
    * the gaze
    * surveillance, panopticon
    * picture theories, iconologies (Mitchell)
    * in/visibility (Hollow Man)
    * aesthetics of dis/appearance
    * design/writing
    * transparency of evil
    * interface criticism
    * the "fourth wall"
    * phantasms
    * ekphrasis
    * iconography
    * optics
    * visual semiotics
    * society of the spectacle
    * simulation and simulacra
    * xerox culture/culture of the copy
    * information visualization
    * camera lucida/obscura
    * re/presentation
    * visual poetry/poetics
    * formulations of the visual in rhetorical and critical theory
    --------------------------------

    David Blakesley
    Director of Professional Writing
    Department of English
    Purdue University
    West Lafayette, IN 47907
    Email: blakesle@purdue.edu or
    Phone: (765) 494-3772
    Fax: (765) 494-3780

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 12 2000 - 17:38:13 EDT