CFP: Cultural Politics of Globalization (5/31/01; 10/26/01)

From: Imre Szeman (szeman@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca)
Date: Wed Nov 15 2000 - 21:56:50 EST

  • Next message: Trevor Ross: "CFP: 18th C. Speculations (1/15/01; NEASECS/AtSECS, 11/1/01-11/4/01)"

    CALL FOR PAPERS

    Content Providers of the World Unite!
    The Cultural Politics of Globalization

    John Douglas Taylor Conference ~ Friday, October 26, 2001
    Department of English ~ McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Keynote speakers: Len Findlay ~ Naomi Klein ~ Dot Tuer

    Depending on which accounts of globalization one reads, culture is either
    at the center of the new global economy or it has been totally eclipsed by
    it. On the one hand, cultural objects and practices now appear as
    absolutely constitutive of economic, political and social practices, to
    such a degree that analyses of the latter that do not take culture into
    account have to be treated as theoretically and empirically
    impoverished. On the other, as popular culture becomes reduced to mass
    culture on an intensified, global scale, the liberatory and resistant
    impulses once associated, if in different ways, with both high and low
    culture seem to have been almost fatally diminished.

    The term "content providers" captures this paradoxical position of culture
    in globalization. In the new global economy, culture has become
    "content," and cultural workers and critics have become "content
    providers" whose work is more essential to the operations of the economy
    than ever before, but only as a content that does nothing to challenge the
    structure or form of the new world order. "Content Providers of the World
    Unite!" calls on critics and cultural workers to consider the challenges
    that globalization poses for an adequate understanding of cultural
    politics and the politics of culture at the present time. How do we make
    sense of a time in which culture seems to have become both more and less
    essential to the prevailing economic order, a time in which the
    (older) relationship between culture and politics seems both more
    difficult and necessary to maintain? Among the questions that we hope to
    address at this conference are:

    - In what ways is culture important to understanding globalization and
    politics in the global era? How is it related to other aspects of
    individual and social existence (health, economics, politics,
    ecology?) (How) has its meaning shifted in response to the processes of
    globalization?

    - How does culture at the present time mediate between individuals and
    broader structures of power (the state, the nation, stock markets, TNCs,
    NGOs, etc.)? Do we need to develop new political models in order to
    comprehend new forms of mediation?

    - How does race and ethnicity intersect with the new conditions for
    culture and politics in globalization? For example, in what ways has the
    concept of cultural difference contributed to the production of ethnic
    subjectivities and the ethnicization of the political?

    - What new form or forms do/should cultural politics take at the present
    time?

    - Is there any role left for an artistic or cultural avant-garde?

    - What theoretical concepts do we need to abandon, invent or re-invent
    with respect to contemporary circumstances? Does it, for example, make
    sense to speak of ideology in a "post-political" era?

    - In the global era, should we re-consider our suspicions about
    universalist or totalizing categories?

    - What is the role of the university-and particularly of the humanities-in
    developing forms of cultural critique adequate to the process of
    globalization? Does the attenuation of the public sphere inhibit the
    production of culture in general, and politically progressive culture in
    particular, or is it a necessary complement to the generation of new
    venues of critical cultural production (e.g., the streets of Seattle)?

    - What constitutes an adequate pedagogy of culture? Can ideology critique
    continue to be the primary mode by which we teach students to be critical
    of culture?

    - Is it still possible to imagine new forms of political community? How
    does/can culture help us to imagine new forms of political community? What
    might a global democracy or civil society look like?

    Abstracts should be no longer than 300 words and should be mailed on or by
    MAY 31, 2001.

    Send abstracts/queries/suggestions to:

    Susie O'Brien and Imre Szeman
    Department of English, McMaster University
    1280 Main Street W., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L9
    Phone: (905) 525-9140 x23724 or x23725 / Fax: (905) 777-8316
    E-mail: obriensu@mcmaster.ca ~or~ szeman@mcmaster.ca

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 19 2000 - 10:26:26 EST