CFP: Recyclables: Critical Approaches to Cultural Recycling (9/1/01; collection)

From: Tina Kendall (tskendall@ucdavis.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 18:25:31 EDT

  • Next message: maryjo mahoney: "CFP: Poetry (7/21/01; CNYCLL, 10/28/01-10/30/01)"

    Call for Papers:
    Recyclables:
    Critical Approaches to Cultural Recycling

    There is nothing new about the practice of recycling. The recycling
    phenomenon has been with us for decades: artistically, culturally, and,
    more than ever, in our homes, we are accustomed to (or are becoming
    accustomed to) recycling our waste, our excess, our re-usable goods. But
    now the term "recycling" has also made a conspicuous appearance within
    academic discourse, emerging as a paradigm for understanding the way that
    artistic, literary, or cultural environments function. What can we make of
    this transposition: is recycling a valid paradigm for talking about
    literature, history, art, or theory? How might the term recycling nuance
    our understanding of the ways in which different social, theoretical, or
    cultural environments operate?

    Our collection of critical essays intends to explore the rhetoric of
    recycling as a cultural, historical, and critical construct. We are
    particularly interested in investigating differences between recycling and
    other critical terms such as "appropriation," "bricolage," or "recoding."
    We welcome papers from across different disciplines that
    define/legitimize/question the subject of recycling. Contributions should
    shed new light on the already old idea of recycling. Papers might address,
    but are by no means limited to the following topics and questions:

    Recycling and Aesthetic Queries:
    How has the aesthetic/cultural experience of modernity/postmodernity been
    shaped by a relationship to recycling? How have the concepts of
    "originality" and "genius" been reconfigured in a cultural context where
    simulacrum and pastiche are increasingly important?
    Recycling and Cultural Memory:
    How do historical/autobiographical/ethnobiographical narratives recycle
    past events, materials, or memories in order to make claims about the past?
    What are the ideological implications of recycling as a mode of historiography?
    Authorship, Ownership, and Intellectual Property:
    What are the legislative implications for the concepts of authorship,
    ownership, and intellectual property under the aegis of recycling? If we
    view acts of cultural production as forms of recycling rather than acts of
    pure creation, how does this complicate our definitions of plagiarism?
    Bio-recycling:
    Explorations in Cloning, or: How recycling took the sex out of sexual
    reproduction.
    Recycling Critical Terminology:
    How does the term "recycling" differ from or share ground with popular
    critical paradigms such as bricolage, appropriation, (Deleuzian)
    repetition, diff=E9rance, simulacrum, pastiche, eternal return, the nostalgia
    mode, the return of the repressed, etc.?
    Recycling as Ethical Mandate:
    Sacrificing our goods for the (common) Good, or: Recycling as Ritual
    Between Exhaustion and Excess:
    What are the differences between a recycling practice prompted by the=20
    exhaustion of resources and a more "excessive" recycling practice, in which
    recycling is a form of aesthetic play?
    Production, Perversion, Pleasure:
    To what extent can recycling itself be considered productive or
    pleasurable? Does the idea of recycling negate desire? Or is there room
    for erotic play in a process of repetition? Could recycling be considered
    masturbatory? A symptom of private or cultural impotence? What might it
    mean to explore the physical, sexual, or puritanical aspects of a
    fascination with recycling?
    Refusing to Recycle:
    How does a refusal to recycle =91trash=92 different institutions (literary,
    bureaucratic, aesthetic)? Is there anything that cannot be recycled? What
    are the implications of an aesthetic or political refusal to recycle?
    Recycling and the Information Age:
    What are the epistemological implications or limitations of recycling in
    cyberspace? If the Internet constitutes a utopic space of recycling, then
    what are the implications for us, its virtual ragpickers?

    We are currently negotiating with University Presses for publication.
    Please send one to two page abstracts (by September 1) to:

    Tina S. Kendall Kristin Koster
    Department of French Department of French
    1 Shields Ave. 1 Shields Ave.
    University of California University of California
    Davis, CA 95616 Davis, CA 95616
    tskendall@ucdavis.edu kekoster@ucdavis.edu

    Please visit our website: http://philo.ucdavis.edu/~kendall

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 08 2001 - 16:12:32 EDT