CFP: Bad Subjects: Various Topics re: Progressive Politics (various; e-journal)

From: lockard@socrates.berkeley.edu
Date: Thu Jul 19 2001 - 08:52:28 EDT

  • Next message: Gayle Geiger: "UPDATE: Enhancing Rhetoric Instruction: Using Technology to Support Argumentation and Discourse (7/27/01; CNYCLL, 10/28/01-10/30/01)"

                        BAD SUBJECTS 2001-2002
                        ----------------------

                           CALL FOR ESSAYS

    BAD SUBJECTS is entering its tenth season of publication as a journal of
    the left and a collective. Bad Subjects seeks to revitalize progressive
    politics. We think too many people on the left have taken their
    convictions for granted. So we challenge progressive dogma by encouraging
    readers to think about the political dimension to all aspects of everyday
    life. We seek to broaden the audience for leftist and progressive
    writing, through a commitment to accessibility and contemporary relevance.
    Bad Subjects publishes both hardcopy and online editions, with
    approximately 100,000 online readers monthly. The Bad Subjects website is
    at http://eserver.org/bs.

    Most of our issues are dedicated to particular topics, and the topics of
    our next five issues have been listed below together with contact
    information. Most issues also contains essays on other topics too, so feel
    free to submit an article even if it doesn't seem to fit an upcoming
    topic. For general queries, contact the Bad Subjects editors at
    <bad@uclink.berkeley.edu>.

    TELEVISION (Issue 57)

    There's nothing quite as "everyday life" as television in America. It's
    so everyday that countries like Bhutan, which only recently acquired
    television, are concerned about threats to their cultural uniqueness.
    The average American television program has become a transnational source
    of hegemony and monoculture.

    Rather than simply saying "Kill your television", Bad Subjects would
    rather ask questions. In what ways does television either reinforce or
    challenge the status quo? Are issues of difference, such as queer life or
    criminal life, covered in ways that are or can be seen as revolutionary?
    Or, to make it more personal, did you ever watch a program on television
    and think "I'm not the only one ... how cool."

    Tune in, set the volume loud, and think about your favorite programs.
    Transmit your essays to the Television issue programming directors, Paul
    Ish <pbjtoy@hotmail.com> and Cynthia Hoffman <choff@lanminds.com>.
    September 4, 2001 submission deadline.

    THE POLICE STATE (Issue 58)

    American progressives used the term 'police state' to protest state and
    federal repression of the civil rights and anti-war movements in the
    1960s. Perhaps the best-known example of the police state in action was
    the FBI's COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program), which was directed
    against the American Indian Movement in the 1970s, and at sympathizers of
    Latin American revolutionary movements and environmental groups during the
    late 1980s.

    More recently, the term came back into vogue during the 1990s to describe
    the increasingly repressive policies of the Clinton Administration, which
    opened its administrative tenure with Waco and concluded it with a
    staggering record of funding for police and prisons.

    The Police State issue of Bad Subjects addresses how this concept of
    government can be applied in the current day and age, following the
    so-called decline of the nation-state and the advent of globalization in
    the post-Cold War era. Could Marx's often prophesized "withering away of
    the state" mean that the government will abandon violent means to maintain
    social order? Or will repressive state functions endure as held-over,
    consolidated remainders of nation-state authority? Are we now living in a
    global society of security, where a transnational diffusion of corporate
    power is maintained by a combination of regional security cooperation
    associations, like NATO, and personal information-gathering strategies?

    The possibilities are endless. Submit your essays to issue editors Megan
    Shaw Prelinger <alysons@earthlink.net> and Joel Schalit
    <riotgoy@ix.netcom.com> by October 15, 2001.

    CRUISING (Issue 59)

    When the Left takes on the character of a global carnival, traveling from
    site to site to lob rocks at corporate overlords and smash the state -- or
    at least, dematerialize it -- mobility is more important than ever.
    While college students emerge from Union Summers, Marxists like Toni Negri
    raise the on-the-road Wobblies as the left-most model of organization.
    As capital goes cruising, so goes the left.

    The Cruising issue wants stories about the relationship of traveler to
    terrain, and the relationship of fellow travelers to protest movements
    that have put much of the bite back in the Left. New Autonomists and
    their critics can cruise and sex each other up in our pages, and we'll all
    get our freaks on.

    Who cruises where, how, and why? And who cruises whom? Cruising is all
    about movement, but the movements are many. Ships range about the seas;
    men cruise one another; big vehicles find their cruising altitudes and
    cruising speeds. Bad Subjects seeks essays that capture the mobile spirit
    of the times in travel, in rebellion, in chasing sex. Whether you're
    riding through life on cruise control, looking for love in all the wrong
    places, gunning your motor through fast and furious streets, or denouncing
    those who are cruisin' for a bruisin', we want to hear from you.

    Tell us about your sex life and political life, and where they met. From
    Tom Cruise to Cruise missiles, the subject matter is wide open. Drive an
    idea by Aaron Shuman <AShuman101@aol.com> or Jonathan Sterne
    <jsterne+@pitt.edu>. Submission deadline November 30, 2001.

    IMMIGRATION AND DIASPORA (Issue 60)

    It is no exaggeration to say that immigration is one of the globe's most
    pressing political issues. Across the world, immigration -- how to control
    it, its desirability, who should be allowed to do it -- has become a hotly
    disputed topic.

    The Immigration issue will investigate the various forms that these
    politics of immigration have adopted across the world. It will pay
    particular attention to the experiences of the many parties involved in
    the migration process, from the immigrants crossing the multiple borders
    that define contemporary political space to those left behind, to the
    residents of the receiving countries, to the politicians and activists
    involved in defining the contours of the contemporary politics of
    population flow.

    Possible essay topics include: borders, citizenship, violence against
    immigrants, border control and the policing of borders, flows of people,
    money, ideas, commodities across borders both real and imagined,
    narratives of immigration in film and other pop cultural media, immigrant
    political and cultural representation, immigrants in the public sphere,
    political mobilization around immigration issues, multiculturalism,
    anti-immigration politics, sex tourism.

    Bad Subjects editors Frederick Aldama <Faldama@aol.com>, John Brady
    <jsbrady@socrates.berkeley.edu>, and Robert Soza
    <soza@uclink4.berkeley.edu> will edit this issue. January 31, 2002
    submission deadline.

    THE AESTHETICS OF VIOLENCE (Issue 61)

    The daily injuries of authority structures and social discipline under
    global capitalism proliferate continuously. Yet while the deprivations of
    poverty are being dismissed as violence in their own right, the deployment
    of state violence has been elevated to new heights of romantic heroism.
    Racial, sexual and class violence in the multi-billion-dollar
    entertainment and music industries normalizes coercive violence by the
    state apparatus.

    Between the Pentagon and Hollywood, producing the means and promotional
    images of violence have become US export industries par excellence.
    Globalization arrives inseparable from guns or stories of men and weapons
    in service to the nation-state. Representations of violence against 'bad
    subjects' are being marketed as ideological legitimization for its use,
    and agents of social domination generate demands for an aestheticized
    violence that fits political specifications. But 'bad subjects' can't
    leave their reality cinema or turn off the TV once bullets start flying:
    we are both the audience and the subjects.

    Violence -- even where a defensive or liberational necessity -- is
    quintessentially ugly. Its representation involves expressive choices that
    collectively constitute an aesthetic that turns such ugliness to political
    purposes. This issue of Bad Subjects examines how the aesthetics of
    violence manifest themselves under the terms of contemporary transnational
    capitalism. To whose benefit are bodies being mutilated on screens and on
    streets? How do dominant cultures perpetuate their power through
    representations of physical domination in action? What happens when
    violence becomes a consumer item? How did we come to enjoy the sight of
    violence so, how do we love it so?

    Bad Subjects invites violent prose fits on these topics. Contact Arturo
    Aldama <aaldma@asu.edu> or Joe Lockard <lockard@socrates.berkeley.edu.>
    March 15, 2002 submission deadline.

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 16:47:21 EDT