CFP: Deconstruction and Cinema (9/15/01; NEMLA, 4/12/02-4/13/02)

From: Sean Desilets (sdesilet@emerald.tufts.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 16:29:43 EDT

  • Next message: Robert Lougy: "CFP: Voyeurism and Exhibitionism in Victorian Literature (9/15/01; NEMLA, 4/12/02-4/13/02)"

    Call for Papers

    Deconstruction and Cinema
    2002 Northeast Modern Language Association Convention
    Toronto. April 12 & 13, 2002

    Because its chief rival, psychoanalysis, has dominated theoretical
    discourse on film for the last thirty years, deconstruction has had
    relatively little to say about cinema. In part, we can justify this
    silence by recognizing that deconstruction is explicitly concerned with
    literature. On the other hand, though, deconstruction has tended to expand
    the purview of what counts as a literary text. Even the most vigorous and
    convincing of deconstructionist advocates of literary specificity, Paul de
    Man, has written that "[w]e now have to recognize the necessity of a
    non-perceptual, linguistic moment in painting and music, and learn to read
    pictures rather than to imagine meaning." This panel, then, will bring
    cinema and deconstruction into dialog, considering not only how
    deconstruction can address cinema, but also how cinema reflects back on
    deconstruction. We might imagine, for example, that an art form rooted so
    strongly in the phenomonal status of the photographic object might present
    rather a challenge to a discourse that rejects any epistemology rooted in
    a pre-linguistic model of perception. Coming at the same question the
    other way, however, deconstruction might teach us to pay better attention
    to cinema's "rhetoric," the ways in which its technology gives shape to
    what we only mistake for a pregiven reality. Deconstruction might also
    help us to perceive cinema's deployment of the same techniques to
    construct itself as an aesthetic object, despite cinema's very deep
    implication in a historical conjunction that has arguably brought
    aesthetics to its final crisis. I am not at all interested in presenting
    deconstruction as an "alternative" to psychoanalysis in film studies, and
    will not welcome papers that valorize deconstruction in the interest of
    bashing psychoanalysis. I will welcome papers that either lay out the
    theoretical groundwork for a dialog between cinema and deconstruction or
    begin that dialog in readings of particular films and/or deconstructive
    texts.

    Please submit 1-2 page abstracts by September 15 to:

    Sean Desilets
    Department of English
    Tufts University
    Medford, MA 02155

    sdesilet@tufts.edu

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 02 2001 - 15:52:45 EDT