CFP: Women, Letters, and Victorian Fiction (2/18/02; MMLA, 11/8/02-11/10/02)

From: Laura Rotunno (ler556@mizzou.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 03 2002 - 15:07:24 EST

  • Next message: Ingrid Hotz-Davies: "CFP: Scandals as Cultural Phenomenon (France) (2/15/02; 8/30/02-9/3/02)"

    I apologize for the short notice of this cfp (deadline 18 February
    2002); I have met with some unavoidable changes in potential panelists’
    plans.

    Through the Post: Women, Letters, and Victorian Fiction
    Proposed Session
    2002 M/MLA Annual Convention
    8-10 November 2002, Minneapolis, MN

    It was commonplace, especially throughout the eighteenth century, to
    equate letters with writing women did well. In part because of such
    associations, the epistolary novel is typically seen as a feminine
    genre. And though the traditional epistolary novel did not thrive in
    the Victorian period, nineteenth-century British fiction did not see an
    end to women writing letters. Brontë’s Lucy Snowe, Gaskell’s Cranford
    community, Trollope’s Lizzie Eustace, and Stoker’s Mina Harker are only
    a few of the more memorable female letter-writers and letter-readers to
    populate the Victorian novel. This panel explores the significance of
    this feminine epistolary presence in the Victorian novel, specifically
    as it pertains to the letters’ capacity to comment on women’s position
    in the literary world.

    Through the Post: Women, Letters, and Victorian Fiction, a session I
    plan to propose for the 2002 M/MLA Annual Convention in Minneapolis,
    Minnesota (8-10 November 2002), will look at questions such as:

    —what literary and/or social traditions do these women’s letters adopt,
    adapt, and/or critique and why?
    —do the women’s letters "compete" with men’s letters and/or other types
    of writing within these novels, and what issues arise from the
    comparisons and contrasts?
    —how does the women’s letter-writing comment on novels’ "proper"
    subjects, their ability to appeal to audiences, their capacity for
    expressing women’s concerns?
    —what is the effect of women novelists’ or fictional female characters’
    use of letters on the "definition" of the Victorian novel or the
    Victorian novelist?

    These questions are not the only possible ones to consider; I encourage
    a diversity of approaches. Please send 1-page abstracts by 18 February
    2002 to ler556@mizzou.edu or Laura Rotunno, Department of English, 107
    Tate Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Also feel free
    to write me with any questions.

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 06 2002 - 22:04:54 EST