CFP: Feminism and Composition Studies (4/13/02; CCCC, 4/?/03)

From: Leanne Warshauer (leannebw@optonline.net)
Date: Thu Apr 04 2002 - 10:50:48 EST

  • Next message: lkday: "CFP: Classical Myths in Recent Literature and Film (12/10/02; SW/TX PCA/ACA, 2/12/03-2/15/03)"

    Below you'll find a call for proposals for a Pre-Conference Feminist
    Workshop at next years 4Cs convention in New York City. We hope to
    continue the tradition of planning for a workshop that will engage,
    challenge, and build connections among those who are interested in the
    relationships between feminism and composition studies.

    We have crafted a proposal to establish a general theme for discussions,
    but we offer this only as a prompt. The session title is: Feminist
    Narratives of Connection and Displacement: Painful Transformations.
    Submissions should be e-mailed to both of us; the deadline is April 13,
    2002.

    CALL FOR PROPOSALS

    CCCC 2003 Pre-conference Feminist Workshop

    SESSION TITLE: Feminist Narratives of Connection and Displacement:
    Painful Transformations

    The 2003 CCCC conference invokes "Theme for English B" by Langston
    Hughes to establish a rubric for conference papers, and suggests that
    Hughes's poem be read as a statement about how instructors and students
    are "implicated within each other," and that "in order to learn--we must
    learn together, from and with each other." This happy conclusion,
    however, is troubled by the question of who learns what from whom, and
    who gets to decide what counts as a recognizable sign of learning.
    Indeed, Hughes's poem examines how specific, lived experiences impact
    our expectations about whether and how language enables us to
    communicate. The poem's speaker, a student, responds to an assignment to
    write an essay using an "authentic" voice by invoking his specific
    experiences as an African-American male living in Harlem. The poem asks
    if that context will affect not only what the student writes, but also
    if it will affect how the teacher comes to evaluate the essay. Hughes
    draws attention to textual anxieties produced by competing cultural
    values. His poem suggests that we are "implicated within each other" in
    multiple and not necessarily equal ways.

    In next year's workshop, we hope to address the question of how
    feminists should sort through the multiple and unequal ways that "we are
    implicated within each other." The question of how to learn from each
    other and draw connections is not only problematic in the
    student/teacher relationship, but also extends to feminists as well. Can
    feminist teachers learn from each other if each of us brings different
    experiences to the table? How should feminists sort through the unruly
    and vast question of who learns what from whom? In what ways can
    procedures that appear to be equitable and inclusive result in
    establishing exclusions?

    We plan to arrange a full-day session that will retain much of the
    organizational structure of previous years in terms of combining formal
    presentations with informal round table discussions. We would like to
    retain the flexibility that marked last year's workshop, so, as stated
    above, all proposals relative to feminism and composition are welcome.
    At the same time, we hope to solicit lead off speakers who will directly
    address the issues raised in the prompt. We are interested in papers
    that bear witness to the difficulties that may be encountered as we
    attempt to do the work required of us as composition instructors in
    academic environments. Those difficulties implicate how we define our
    work in the classroom, with our colleagues, with organizations that earn
    our affiliations, and within the relationships we have with those who
    are not affiliated with the academy. In what ways does Langston Hughes's
    poem ask us to think about how we evaluate and render judgments about
    the work that we do and expect from others? Should we devise new methods
    of evaluation? How should feminists testify to the relationship between
    the specific lived experience and speaking for general groups?

    Please let us know if you would like to speak directly to any of these
    issues and be considered for one of the lead off positions.

    We are working with a cruelly short deadline. Please don't get
    discouraged!
    Here are some guidelines:

    -We need to receive proposals by April 13.
    -cc your proposal as an MS Word attachment to both chairs since we are
    working long distance: Leanne Warshauer [leannebw@optonline.net] and Eve
    Wiederhold [wiederholde@mail.ecu.edu].
    - Proposals should include:
    name
    institution
    home address
    office phone
    email address
    fax
    indicate if first-time presenter at CCCC

    Title of your presentation
    Summary of presentation (as long as you would like)
    A one or two sentence ABSTRACT for us to use in our collective proposal
    to NCTE.

    We hope to hear from you soon,
    Leanne Warshauer, Lecturer, SUNY Stony Brook

    Eve Wiederhold, Assistant Professor, East Carolina University

             ===============================================
             From the Literary Calls for Papers Mailing List
                          CFP@english.upenn.edu
                           Full Information at
                    http://www.english.upenn.edu/CFP/
              or write Erika Lin: elin@english.upenn.edu
             ===============================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 05 2002 - 11:35:33 EST